Depree

Depree v. Jungwirth

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20232:22-cv-01462California3,046 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

SCOTT DEPREE, No. 2:22-cv-01462-TLN-DMC

Plaintiff, v. ORDER JERRY A. JUNGWIRTH II, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Jerry A. Jungwirth II (“Jungwirth”), Richard Knox (“Knox”), Eric Patterson (“Patterson”), and County of Tehama’s (“County”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff Scott Depree (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 10.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 12.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On May 16, 2018, Deputy Jungwirth observed what he believed to be a marijuana cultivation on Plaintiff’s property located at Ridgeline Court in Cottonwood, California. (ECF No. 1 at 5.) On May 21, 2018, Deputy Jungwirth issued a Notice of Violation and Proposed Administrative Penalty,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.