Gomez

(PC) Dickson v. Gomez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20231:17-cv-00294California4,561 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER DICKSON, Case No. 1:17-cv-00294-ADA-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

v. (ECF No. 70) GOMEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 I. Procedural History Plaintiff Christopher Dickson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Gomez, Rios, and Martinez for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendants Duncan and Esparza for violations of Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment due process rights. On May 21, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for an order compelling discovery. (ECF No. 70.) Following a meet and confer regarding the discovery dispute, the parties filed a joint statement indicating that six discovery issues remained unresolved. (ECF No. 72.) The Court reinstated briefing on the motion to compel as to the remaining six issues. (ECF No. 73.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.