CDCR
(PC) Ripple v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LORRAINE RIPPLE, No. 1:22-cv-01102-ADA-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND
v. DISMISSING CASE DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
CDCR, et al., (ECF No. 23) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Lorraine Ripple is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 5.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 22, 2022, the Magistrate Judge screened Plaintiff’s initial complaint and found that it failed to state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 11.) After receiving two extensions of time to respond to the screening order, Plaintiff failed to file a timely first amended complaint. (See ECF Nos. 13, 15.) Therefore, on March 27, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the court…