CDCR

(PC) Ripple v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20231:22-cv-01102California1,223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LORRAINE RIPPLE, No. 1:22-cv-01102-ADA-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND

v. DISMISSING CASE DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

CDCR, et al., (ECF No. 23) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Lorraine Ripple is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 5.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 22, 2022, the Magistrate Judge screened Plaintiff’s initial complaint and found that it failed to state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 11.) After receiving two extensions of time to respond to the screening order, Plaintiff failed to file a timely first amended complaint. (See ECF Nos. 13, 15.) Therefore, on March 27, 2023, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.