(SS) Miller v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20232:22-cv-00798California2,277 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAYA J. MILLER, Case No. 2:22-cv-00798-JDP (SS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff challenges the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 15 & 19. The court grants plaintiff’s motion, denies the Commissioner’s, and remands this matter for further administrative proceedings. Standard of Review An Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision denying an application for disability benefits will be upheld if it is supported by substantial evidence in the record and if the correct legal standards have been applied. Stout v. Comm’r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 454 F.3d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir. 2006). “‘Substantial evidence’ means more than a mere scintilla, but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.