Central CA Environmental Justice Network v. Randolph
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA No. 2:22-cv-01714-DJC-CKD ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE NETWORK, et al., ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ECF NO. 41 Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 LIANE RANDOLPH, in her official capacity as Chair of the Air Resources Board, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiffs previously moved for summary judgment, which the Court granted. Not satisfied with the relief granted, Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Order. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration. LEGAL STANDARD Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may file a “motion to alter or amend a judgment” within “28 days after the entry of the judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). “Although Rule 59(e) permits a district court to reconsider and amend a previous order, the rule offers an ‘extraordinary remedy, to be used sparingly in the interests of finality and conservation of…