(PC) Johnson v. Unknown FBI Agents

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20232:22-cv-01375California697 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Kevin B. Johnson, No. 2:22-cv-01375-KJM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER v. Unknown FBI Agents, 1S Defendants. 16 On August 21, 2023, this court adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations in full. Order, ECF No. 52. Plaintiff Kevin B. Johnson has filed a “Notice of Trespass” and states he has not received any legal mail and thus has not had the opportunity to 20 object to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations. Notice, ECF No. 54. In that notice, plaintiff moves for recusal of the magistrate judge. /d. at 4. First, plaintiff has had the opportunity to and did object to the findings and recommendations. See Objs., ECF No. 48; Order Granting Mot. Extension of Time to File Objs., ECF No. 47. Second, plaintiffs motion for recusal proffers no basis for recusal under 28 U.S.C. §§ 144 or 455. Under 28 U.S.C. § 455, a magistrate judge must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.