Sanchez

Sanchez v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20232:19-cv-01545California6,488 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRYSTAL R. SANCHEZ, No. 2:19-cv-01545-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Presently before the Court is Defendants County of Sacramento (“County”), Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department (“SCSD”), and Deputy Daren D. Allbee’s (“Allbee” and collectively with County and SCSD, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment or Adjudication. ECF No. 91; see also Defs.’ Mem. ISO Mot. Summ. J., ECF No. 91-1 (“Defs.’ Mem.”). This matter has been fully briefed. ECF Nos. 93 (“Pl.’s Opp’n”), 94 (“Defs.’ Reply”). For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.1 /// /// /// 27 1 Because oral argument would not have been of material assistance, the Court declined to set a hearing and decides this matter on the briefs. E.D. Local Rule 230(g). BACKGROUND2 2 At all relevant times, Plaintiff Crystal Sanchez’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.