Giannini

Giannini v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20232:21-cv-00581California2,468 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC GIANNINI, No. 2:21–cv–00581–KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, ET AL., Defendant 16 17 Presently pending before this court is defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s second amended complaint (SAC). (ECF No. 19.) The crux of the SAC concerns the alleged removal of plaintiff Eric Giannini’s children from his house without a warrant, or a valid basis for an exception to the warrant requirement, by defendant Sacramento Department of Child, Family, and Adult Services (“DCFAS”). (ECF No. 16 at 6.) The SAC asserts twenty-two claims against the following defendants: County of Sacramento, Ivory Jones, Halley Hallaran, Donna Furtado, Tara Zielenski, Franca Umeh, Ballay Kamara, Staci Moreno, Richard Hamilton, Michael Pietrek, and Shawn Allgeier. (Id. at 1.) //// / ///

//// As set forth below, the court GRANTS defendant’s motion to dismiss and GRANTS

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.