Burton

(HC) Henry v. Burton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20232:22-cv-00609California518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT HENRY, No. 2:22-cv-0609 KJM DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER ROBERT BURTON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 30, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court declines to adopt the findings and recommendations. The magistrate judge recommends…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.