(PC) Suarez v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20231:22-cv-00160California4,243 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ALFREDO SUAREZ, No. 1:22-cv-00160-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

REGARDING DEFENDANTS’

v. EXHAUSTION MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

KEN CLARK, et al., (ECF No. 53) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ exhaustion motion for summary judgment, filed June 15, 2023. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding against on Plaintiff’s excessive force claim against Defendant O. Valladolid, failure to intervene claim against Defendants B. Camargo, Gamboa, and T. Hieng, and retaliation claim against Defendant Gamboa. Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on December 12, 2022. (ECF No. 38.) After an unsuccessful settlement conference, the Court issued the discovery and 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.