(PC) Van den Heuvel v. El Dorado County Judicials

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20232:23-cv-01523California410 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN MARK VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:23-cv-01523 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

EL DORADO COUNTY JUDICIALS, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 18 Plaintiff, a former county detainee, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on June 9, 2023, but did not file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) or pay the filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) On August 3, 2023, the court issued an order directing plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, either the $350 filing fee plus the $52 administrative fee or a motion to procced IFP. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. (Id.) Those thirty days have passed and plaintiff has not filed a motion to proceed IFP, paid the filing fee, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, the undersigned //// 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.