Curry

(PC) Humphries v. Curry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20232:22-cv-00090California448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARYLE L. HUMPHRIES, Case No. 2:22-cv-00090 KJN PC 12 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION TO v. MODIFY THE DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER P. CURRY, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. He previously requested a settlement conference. (ECF No. 33.) On September 22, 2023, defendant filed a second request to modify the discovery and scheduling order. Defendant requests a settlement conference and that the court extend the dispositive motion deadline or stay the case to facilitate a settlement conference. “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Rule 16(b) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.