Gomez

(PC) Dickson v. Gomez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20231:17-cv-00294California3,854 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CHRISTOPHER DICKSON, Case No. 1:17-cv-00294-ADA-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DEFENDANTS ESPARZA

v. AND DUNCAN’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GOMEZ, et al., (ECF No. 83) Defendants.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

14 I. Introduction Plaintiff Christopher Dickson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendants Gomez, Rios, and Martinez for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendants Duncan and Esparza for violations of Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment due process rights. Currently before the Court is Defendants Esparza and Duncan’s motion for summary judgment, filed November 8, 2021, on the grounds that they did not violate Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment due process rights during the Rules Violation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.