Burkhart

(PC) Browning v. Burkhart

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20232:21-cv-00978California393 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELRADER BROWNING, III, No. 2:21-cv-0978 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

M. BURKHART, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 26, 2023, plaintiff’s second amended complaint was screened. ECF No. 29. At that time, plaintiff was directed to complete the notice on how to proceed form and file it with the court within fourteen days. Id. at 8-9. On July 17, 2023, the court’s order was returned as “Undeliverable, Return to Sender; Unable to Forward.” Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.