Prentice

Prentice v. The Golden 1 Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20232:23-cv-00025California2,184 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Amy Lopez, Bar No. 335669 amylopez@jonesday.com JONES DAY 3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 800 Irvine, California 92612.4408 Telephone: +1.949.851.3939 Facsimile: +1.949.553.7539 Attorneys for Defendant

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,

INC.

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 ELEZEBETH PRENTICE, Case No. 2:23-cv-00025-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, Judge Troy L. Nunley v. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Experian Information Solutions, Inc.; Complaint filed: January 6, 2023 TransUnion, LLC; The Golden 1 Credit Union, 16 Defendants. 17 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Elezebeth Prentice (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), The Golden 1 Credit Union (“Golden 1”), and TransUnion, LLC (“TransUnion”) through their respective attorneys of record, as follows: WHEREAS, documents and information have been and may be sought, produced or exhibited by and among the parties to this action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.