White
(PC) Cole v. White
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KORRELL SANTANA COLE, Case No. 1:22-cv-00684-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO EXHAUST
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
DEPUTY CHIEF WARDEN WHITE,
JOHN DOE 2-9, OCTOBER 17, 2023 DEADLINE
15 Defendants. 16 Korrell Santana Cole is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. (Doc. Nos. 1, 6). Plaintiff acknowledges on the face of his Complaint that he has not exhausted his administrative remedies. (Doc. No. 1 at 14-15). Indeed, Plaintiff admits that on May 20, 2022 he “filed a 602 grievance form, a 6A-22 request for interview, and an 1824 reasonable accommodation form and has yet to receive a response on either.” (Id.). Plaintiff filed his Complaint on June 6, 2022. (Id. at 6). Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. § 1983], or…