Vasquez
(PC) Cortinas v. Vasquez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00367-JLT-SKO (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS FOLLOWING
v. EVIDENTIARY HEARING
VASQUEZ, et al., (Doc. 157) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff seeks to hold the defendants liable for civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Following an evidentiary hearing, the magistrate judge recommended Plaintiff’s deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant Ramos be permitted to proceed, and that his sexual assault claims against all Defendants be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 157.) The Court advised the parties that any objections were due within fourteen days and that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in waiver of his rights on appeal.” (Id. at 19-20, citing Wilkerson…