(SS) Araiza v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20231:21-cv-00295California6,087 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEMANDA N. ARAIZA, Case No. 1:21-cv-00295-CDB (SS)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLANITIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,

v. AFFIRMING THE COMMISSIONER AND

CLOSING THIS CASE

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (Docs. 20, 21) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Demanda N. Araiza (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for Social Security benefits pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Defendant filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s brief. (Doc. 21). The matter is currently before the Court on the Administrative Record (Doc. 12) and the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. For the reasons set forth below, the Court affirms the ALJ’s decision. / / /

25 26 1 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge and 27 this action has been assigned to the undersigned for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.