CHCF

(PC) Overton v. CHCF

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20232:23-cv-01443California353 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL L. OVERTON, No. 2:23-cv-1443 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FACILITY, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 On August 18, 2023, the court ordered that plaintiff either pay the $402 filing fee for this action or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was warned that failure to do so would result in dismissal. The time allotted to plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis has expired. Although it appears from the docket that plaintiff’s copy of the August 18, 2023, order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.