Loadholt

(PC) Patton v. Loadholt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20232:19-cv-00451California7,480 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY L. PATTON, No. 2: 19-cv-0451 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER F.N.P. LOADHOLT, et al., Defendants. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. (ECF No. 162.) Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 154), defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the merits of plaintiff’s claims (ECF No. 159), defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the grounds that plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies (ECF No. 160), plaintiff’s motion to file a supplemental pleading in support of his motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 173), plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file an amended opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment on //// //// the merits (ECF No. 178),1 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.