Betenbaugh
Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Betenbaugh
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF No. 2:21-cv-01761-TLN-CKD
AMERICA,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 PAUL BETENBAUGH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Safeco Insurance Company of America’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 25.) Defendant Paul Betenbaugh (“Defendant”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 32.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 38.) Also before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Amend the Answer. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff filed an opposition. (ECF No. 27.) Defendant did not file a reply. For the reasons set forth below the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES Defendant’s motion to amend his answer. 24 The only other Defendant in this action, Dalas Gundersen, did not file an opposition.
On November 2, 2022, Defendant filed a motion to file a late reply and the proposed 26 reply. (ECF Nos. 35, 36.) The Court granted Defendant’s motion and ordered him to…