Williams v. Aramark Campus LLC
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20231:23-cv-01082California8,258 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ARMAND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01082-ADA-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING GRANTING IN PART
v. AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE
ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC, et al., TO AMEND
Defendants. (ECF Nos. 5, 10, 11, 12, 13)
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
16 I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court is Defendants Aramark Campus, LLC and Kendall Wright’s1 (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss this action brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF Nos. 5, 10.) Based on the moving, opposition and reply papers, the hearing held on September 27, 2023, and the Court’s record, the Court recommends Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part, and Plaintiff be granted leave to amend his fourth and thirteenth causes of action. /// 27 1 Plaintiff…