Williams v. Aramark Campus LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20231:23-cv-01082California8,258 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARMAND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01082-ADA-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING GRANTING IN PART

v. AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE

ARAMARK CAMPUS LLC, et al., TO AMEND

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 5, 10, 11, 12, 13)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

16 I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court is Defendants Aramark Campus, LLC and Kendall Wright’s1 (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss this action brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF Nos. 5, 10.) Based on the moving, opposition and reply papers, the hearing held on September 27, 2023, and the Court’s record, the Court recommends Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part, and Plaintiff be granted leave to amend his fourth and thirteenth causes of action. /// 27 1 Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.