Walker

(PC) Davis v. Walker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20232:08-cv-00593California706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNARD DAVIS, No. 2:08-cv-0593 KJM DB Plaintiff, v. JAMES WALKER, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________ No. 2:10-cv-2139 KJM DB

KENNARD DAVIS,

18 Plaintiff, 19 v. ORDER JAMES WALKER, et al., 21 Defendants.

24 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 28 On September 1, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties, and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty one days. F&R, ECF No. 318. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 319.1 In accordance with the provisions of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.