O'Neel

O'Neel v. City of Folsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20232:21-cv-02403California730 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 FAUN O’NEEL, individually and as No. 2:21-cv-02403 WBS DB Guardian Ad Litem for her children B.T., A.O., D.O., and

A.T.,

ORDER Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 CITY OF FOLSOM, a public entity; SPENSER HEICHLINGER, an individual; MELANIE CATANIO, an individual; LOU WRIGHT, an individual; DOE CITY OF FOLSOM DEFENDANTS, individuals; KERYN STARKS, an individual; SASHA SMITH, an individual; COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, a public entity; DOE DCFAS DEFENDANTS, individuals; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 24 ----oo0oo---- Defendant County of Sacramento (“defendant”) filed an ex parte application to extend discovery and trial deadlines. (Appl. (Docket No. 53).) Plaintiffs opposed. (Opp’n (Docket No. 54).) On September 5, 2023, plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”). (Docket No. 49.) The TAC adds two defendants1, three judicial deception & continued…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.