Holland

(PC) Murillo v. Holland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20231:15-cv-00266California764 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOAQUIN MURILLO, No. 1:15-cv-00266 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER K. HOLLAND, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 8, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations regarding defendants’ July 20, 2018, motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 113. The magistrate judge recently vacated part of those findings and recommendations but did not vacate the portion recommending summary judgment be granted as to defendant Ybarra. ECF No. 138. The findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. None of the parties filed objections to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.