Wong

Wong v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20232:18-cv-02811California3,859 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHIN KING WONG, et al., No. 2:18-cv-02811-TLN-CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) and U.S. Bank, N.A.’s (“U.S. Bank”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Summary Adjudication. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiffs Chin King Wong (“Wong”) and Robitah Mohd-Khatib (“Mohd-Khatib”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 25.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 27.) Having carefully considered the briefing filed by both parties, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. /// 24 This action involves two named Defendants and 50 unnamed Defendants. Only Wells 25 Fargo and U.S. Bank are parties to the instant motion.

26 Plaintiffs also filed a Request for Judicial Notice with their opposition. (ECF No. 25-2). Specifically, Plaintiffs request the Court take…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.