Ullery

(PC) Turner v. Ullery

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20232:22-cv-00002California350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY D. L. TURNER, No. 2:22-cv-0002-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER MICHAEL ULLERY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 22, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that Plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, Plaintiff was properly served. It is the Plaintiff’s responsibility to always keep the Court apprised of his current address. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.