Warden

(HC) Oatis v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20232:23-cv-01526California368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRUMAINE OATIS, No. 2:23-cv-1526-TLN-CKD Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 8, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner did not file objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner’s responsibility to always keep the court apprised of his current address. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.