Mkrtchyan

Mkrtchyan v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20232:17-cv-02366California2,120 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ARAM MKRTCHYAN, No. 2:17-cv-02366-DAD-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO FILE A FOURTH

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. (Doc. No. 70) 17 This matter is before the court on the motion for leave to file a fourth amended complaint filed on behalf of plaintiff on April 28, 2022. (Doc. No. 70.) The pending motion was taken under submission without oral argument by the previously assigned district judge on May 20, 2022. (Doc. No. 77.) For the reasons explained below, plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a fourth amended complaint will be denied. ///// 24 On August 25, 2022, this case was reassigned to the undersigned. (Doc. No. 85.) The 25 undersigned has endeavored to work through a backlog of inherited submitted motions in civil cases as quickly as possible since returning to the Sacramento courthouse a little over one year 26 ago. In this regard, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.