Schmidt

Schmidt v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20231:23-cv-00052California2,491 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAMILLE SCHMIDT, Case No. 1:23-cv-00052-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE (Doc. 5) COMPANY, INC., and DOES 1 through 50, Defendants. 17 INTRODUCTION This is an insurance case brought by Plaintiff Camille Schmidt, who alleges that Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company underpaid on a claim she filed after her home suffered water damage from a broken pipe. (See generally Doc. 1-1.) On January 11, 2023, asserting diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, Defendant removed the action to this Court from the Superior Court for the County of Fresno. (Doc. 1) On January 26, 2023, Plaintiff moved to remand, arguing that Defendant has not met its burden to demonstrate that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. (Doc. 5.) Defendant opposes the motion (Doc. 6), and Plaintiff replied. (Doc. 8.) The matter was taken under submission on the papers…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.