Faria

Faria v. PNC Bank National Assoc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20232:23-cv-02023California3,712 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL A. FARIA, et al., No. 2:23-cv-02023-DAD-KJN Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE

APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY

PNC BANK NATIONAL RESTRAINING ORDER ASSOCIATION, et al., (Doc. Nos. 6, 10) Defendants.

17 This matter is before the court on an ex parte application for a temporary restraining order filed on behalf of plaintiffs Michael A. Faria and Nanette M. Faria on September 28, 2023. (Doc. No. 6.) For the reasons explained below, plaintiffs’ application will be denied. BACKGROUND On September 18, 2023, plaintiffs filed their verified complaint against defendants PNC Bank, National Association (“PNC Bank”), a mortgage lender, and SN Servicing Corporation (“SN Servicing”), a mortgage servicer, seeking a temporary restraining order deferring a trustee sale of plaintiffs’ property scheduled for October 2, 2023. (Doc. No. 1.) In their verified 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.