(PC) Suarez v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20231:22-cv-00160California1,029 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ALFREDO SUAREZ, No. 1:22-cv-00160-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING, IN PART,

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION KEN CLARK, et al., (ECF No. 64) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s September 11, 2023, order, filed on September 25, 2023. I. LEGAL STANDARD Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) governs the reconsideration orders of the district court. Rule 60(b) permits a district court to relieve a party from an order or judgment on grounds of: “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence ...; (3) fraud ... of an adverse party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied ... or (6)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.