Quick
(PC) Jackson v. Quick
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 CORNEL JACKSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01591-JLT-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTENDANCE OF AN v. INCARCERATED WITNESS 14 JASON QUICK, et al., (ECF No. 143).
Defendants.
16 17 18 Plaintiff Cornel Jackson is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 19 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s claims 20 that Defendants Jason Quick, Elizabeth Alvarez, A. Rossette, Lt. Followill, Lisette Lopez, 21 Dominic Ramos, Hermina Marley, and Carmela Prudente violated his First and Sixth Amendment 22 rights regarding his legal mail. (ECF No. 131). The matter is currently set for a pretrial conference on October 23, 2023. (ECF No. 148). No trial date has yet been set; however, the presiding District Judge will set a trial at the pretrial conference. (See ECF No. 139). Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for the attendance of an incarcerated witness, Steve Garcia, who is alleged to…