(PC) Vargas v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20231:20-cv-00083California697 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIC (AKA DIAMOND) VARGAS, Case No.: 1:20-cv-00083-JLT-CDB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO (1) DISMISS DEFENDANT RUDICH, (2) v. DISMISS CLAIM TWO AS TO CERTAIN

DEFENDANTS, AND (3) DISMISS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CERTAIN PLEADED RELIEF IN

CORRECTIONS AND PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED

REHABILITATION, et al., COMPLAINT

Defendants. (Docs. 30 & 33)

14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Plaintiff Dominic Vargas, also known as Diamond Vargas, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In its Third Screening Order (Doc. 30), the Court found Plaintiff’s second amended complaint stated cognizable Eighth Amendment medical indifference claims (Claim I) against Defendants Leslie Taylor, Robert Mitchell, Stephanie Neumann, Tristan Buzzini, Mollie Rudich, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.