(SS) Lamb v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL L. LAMB, Case No. 1:21-cv-01636-HBK Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER TO REMAND CASE
TO COMMISSIONER1
v. (Doc. No. 19, 22) KILOLO KIJAKAZI,
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY, Defendant. 17 18 Michael L. Lamb (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 19, 22-23). For the reasons stated , the Court orders this matter REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. I. JURISDICTION Plaintiff filed for supplemental security income on November 30, 2002. (AR 169).
1 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(c)(1). (Doc. No. 10). 28 1 …