(SS) Lamb v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20231:21-cv-01636California4,373 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL L. LAMB, Case No. 1:21-cv-01636-HBK Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER TO REMAND CASE

TO COMMISSIONER1

v. (Doc. No. 19, 22) KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, Defendant. 17 18 Michael L. Lamb (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 19, 22-23). For the reasons stated , the Court orders this matter REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. I. JURISDICTION Plaintiff filed for supplemental security income on November 30, 2002. (AR 169).

1 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(c)(1). (Doc. No. 10). 28 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.