Dillard

Washington v. Dillard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20231:23-cv-00431California803 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PERRY KENJI WASHINGTON, Case No. 1:23-cv-0431 JLT SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE

v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND

DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

CURTIS DILLARD, CLOSE THIS CASE

Defendant. (Docs. 1, 10) 16 Perry Kenji Washington proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this civil rights action against Defendants Curtis Dillard and Ebony. (Doc. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302. The magistrate judge screened the complaint and found Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 4.) The Court granted leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days. (Id. at 9.) The Court served Plaintiff by mail, but the order was returned as undeliverable. After Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.