Gilbert v. 7-Eleven, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20232:21-cv-01984California4,183 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 DARREN GILBERT, No. 2:21-cv-01984 WBS KJN Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION,

FINDINGS OF FACT, AND

7-ELEVEN, INC. dba 7-ELEVEN CONCLUSIONS OF LAW #23615; JATINDER BRAR dba 7- ELEVEN #23615; JATINDER SINGH BRAR dba 7-ELEVEN #23615; I- CHUNG HO, Trustee of the HO LIVING TRUST dated October 26, 1991; MIN-CHING HO, Trustee of the HO LIVING TRUST dated October 26, 1991; and KATHLEEN

A. HO,

20 Defendants.

22 ----oo0oo---- 23 Plaintiff Darren Gilbert brought this action against 24 defendant 7-Eleven, Inc. 1 (“7-Eleven”) alleging that he

26 The parties have stipulated to the dismissal of defendants Jatinder Brar and Jatinder Singh Brar, allegedly doing business as 7-Eleven #23615; I-Ching Ho and Min-Ching Ho, Trustees of the Ho Living Trust; and Kathleen A. Ho. (Docket No. 52.) Because of the stipulation, 7-Eleven, Inc. is the only encountered certain physical barriers to access when he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.