Warden

(HC) Lopez Galindo v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20232:23-cv-00572California427 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PEDRO LOPEZ GALINDO, Case No. 2:23-cv-00572-JDP (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

WARDEN,

Respondent. 16 On June 26, 2023, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 9. On August 8, 2023, after petitioner failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within twenty-one days, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to prosecute. ECF No. 10. I notified him that if he wished to continue with this action, he must, within twenty-one days, file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to respondent’s motion to dismiss. Id. I also warned him that failure to comply with that order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. The deadline has passed, and petitioner has neither filed a response to the motion to dismiss nor otherwise responded to the August 8, 2023 order. Accordingly, it is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.