Crosby
United States v. Crosby
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:22-cv-01611-KJM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER INES CROSBY, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for discovery. ECF No. 27. The parties submitted the required joint statement. ECF No. 31. The matter was taken under submission and heard on the papers. ECF No. 30. I. Introduction The United States brought this case to void and set aside the Deed of Trust that Ines Crosby executed and recorded against her real property, 6245 County Road, Orland, California 95963, in favor of her nephew, Kyle M. Lohse, through the Defense Fund Trust as fraudulent as to a debt of the United States under the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act of 1990 (“FDCPA”). ECF No. 31 at 1-2. The United States alleges that the Deed of Trust was both an actual fraudulent transfer (§ 3304(b)(1)(A)) and a constructive fraudulent transfer (§ 27 …