(PC) Roberts v. Lynch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20232:20-cv-01349California994 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 DAVID NATHANIEL ROBERTS, No. 2:20-cv-01349 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER LYNCH, ET AL., Defendants. 17 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Defendants have moved to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status. (Docket No. 37.) On August 25, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. (Docket No. 40.) The findings and recommendations recommend that the motion to revoke IFP status be denied as moot and that the action be dismissed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.