Weiner

Weiner v. Ocwen Financial Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20232:14-cv-02597California1,309 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID WEINER, No. 2:14-cv-02597-DJC-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff previously filed a Motion to Compel the Testimony of Defendants’ Corporate Representatives. (ECF No. 207.) That motion has remained pending in this case since 2021, though it was stayed for a brief portion of that time. In it, Plaintiff requests that the Court permit Plaintiff to subpoena witnesses who are outside the typical subpoena power of the Court on the grounds that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43 expands the limits of the Court to subpoena power by permitting the usage of “contemporaneous transmission from a different location.” (Id.) Recently, Plaintiff notified the Court of the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in In re Kirkland, 75 F.4th 1030 (9th Cir. 2023). (ECF No. 233.) Plaintiff acknowledges that this decision had rejected the idea that the geographic limitations of Federal Rule of 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.