Sullivan

(PC) Solorio v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 4, 20231:19-cv-00688California1,824 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADRIAN SOLORIO, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00688 JLT GSA (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ) ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO v. ) FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 59(e) ) SULLIVAN, et al., ) (Doc. 157) Defendants. ) ) 16 The jury in this case determined that the defendants did not subject Mr. Solorio to excessive force and defendants Ottsman and Chavez were not deliberately indifferent to any serious medical need he suffered. (Doc. 153) Consequently, the Court entered judgment in favor of the defendants. (Doc. 154) Mr. Solorio now brings a motion to correct the judgment. However, because he fails to meet the requirements of Rule 59(e), the motion is DENIED. I. Background Mr. Solorio claimed that while on the yard at California Correctional Institution at Tehachapi, on August 10, 2018, he was attacked and beaten by the defendants, who were correctional officers. He 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.