(PC) Van Huisen v. Clinton Admin.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20232:23-cv-01596California676 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN, No. 2:23-cv-01596-DJC-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 11, 2023, Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman issued an order granting Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, denied Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel, and dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff has not filed a motion entitled “Request for Admission, Reconsideration, By Way of Affidavit with Exceptional Circumstances” which has been construed as a Motion for Reconsideration of the August 11, 2023 Magistrate Judge Order. (ECF No. 14.)

1 Plaintiff has also subsequently filed a notice of appeal of the order dismissing Plaintiff’s first complaint. ( ECF No. 20.) As this notice was filed well after the motion for reconsideration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.