Quiring

(PC) Casteneda v. Quiring

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20232:21-cv-02196California965 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LORENZO CASTENEDA, No. 2:21-cv-2196 DAD KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FURTHER SCHEDULING

ORDER

J. QUIRING, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 10, 2023, defendants J. Quiring, K. McTaggart, J. Rowe and S. Medina were directed to submit certain grievances for in camera review. (ECF No. 51.) Defendants timely submitted such documents. The court has completed the in camera review. As set forth below, plaintiff’s motion to compel production of certain inmate grievances is denied. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint Plaintiff, under the EOP level of mental health care, alleges that on two separate occasions in April of 2021, defendants J. Quiring, K. McTaggart, J. Rowe and S. Medina conspired to violate plaintiff’s Eighth and First Amendment rights by handcuffing his hands extremely tight behind his back and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.