Kelso

(PC) Puckett v. Kelso

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20231:23-cv-00054California752 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:23-cv-00054-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

DEFENDANT GUTIERREZ SHOULD NOT

v. BE DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT

J. BARRIOS, HERNANDEZ, WHITE, and INFORMATION TO EFFECTUATE

GUTIERREZ, SERVICE

15 Defendants. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants J. Barrios, Hernandez, White and Gutierrez for unconstitutional conditions of confinement in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On June 26, 2023, the Court issued a second order directing service on Defendant Gutierrez via the Court’s E-Service pilot program for civil rights cases for the Eastern District of California. (Doc. No. 35). The order included the following information regarding Defendant 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.