Warden

(PC) Overton v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20232:23-cv-01833California295 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL L. OVERTON, No. 2:23-cv-1833 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

WARDEN, et al., Defendants. 16 By an order filed August 31, 2023, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the court’s filing fee, was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required documents. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.