Dahl

(PC) Adams v. Dahl

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20231:20-cv-00852California638 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL ADAMS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00852 JLT CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE

v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY

WITH COURT ORDERS, AND

DAHL, et al., DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

CLOSE THE CASE

Defendants. (Doc. 62) 16 Paul Adams is a parolee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Kendrick propounded a request for production of documents supporting Plaintiff’s contention that he exhausted available administrative remedies. (Doc. 57-2.) After Plaintiff failed to respond to the discovery request, Defendants filed a motion to compel a response pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 57.) The Court ordered Plaintiff to file a response to the motion to compel. (Doc. 59 at 4.) In the alternative, Plaintiff was informed he could file a notice of non-opposition—and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.