Dahl
(PC) Adams v. Dahl
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL ADAMS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00852 JLT CDB (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE
v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY
WITH COURT ORDERS, AND
DAHL, et al., DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO
CLOSE THE CASE
Defendants. (Doc. 62) 16 Paul Adams is a parolee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Kendrick propounded a request for production of documents supporting Plaintiff’s contention that he exhausted available administrative remedies. (Doc. 57-2.) After Plaintiff failed to respond to the discovery request, Defendants filed a motion to compel a response pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 57.) The Court ordered Plaintiff to file a response to the motion to compel. (Doc. 59 at 4.) In the alternative, Plaintiff was informed he could file a notice of non-opposition—and…