Amps

Amps v. Magsig

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 10, 20231:23-cv-01256California831 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TRAVARIS AMPS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01256-ADA-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR

v. FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER NATHAN MAGSIG, (Doc. 2) Defendant. FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Travaris Amps, proceeding pro se, filed the instant civil action August 22, 2023. (Doc. 1.) On August 23, 2023, Plaintiff was directed to submit an application to proceed in forma paupers or pay the $402.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days of service of the Court’s order. (Doc. 2.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the Court’s order would result in a recommendation for dismissal of this action. (Id.) More than thirty days have passed since service of the Court’s order and Plaintiff has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, paid the filing fee, or otherwise complied with the Court’s order.1 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure . . . of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.