Driver

Driver v. Pape Kenworth

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20232:17-cv-01968California1,607 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGER DRIVER, 2:17-cv-01968-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. PAPÉ TRUCKS, INC., Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Roger Driver filed this diversity action against defendant Pape Trucks, Inc. on September 21, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) Presently pending before the court are defendant’s Motion to Reopen Discovery, ECF No. 87, and plaintiff’s Motion to Set for Trial, ECF No. 88. As discussed below, the court DENIES both motions without prejudice and orders the parties to submit a status report within thirty days of this order. I. Background Per the court’s scheduling order, the parties’ expert witness designations were due by November 30, 2022, expert discovery was due by February 15, 2023, and dispositive motions were to be filed by April 17, 2023. (ECF No. 75 at 2.) On May 17, 2023, having received no dispositive motions, the court ordered the parties to file a motion to set for pretrial conference and/or trial and certification of trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.