Hood

Hood v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20232:23-cv-00232California5,446 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Hood, et al., No. 2:23-cv-00232-KJM-CKD Plaintiffs, ORDER v. City of Sacramento, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Defendants Sacramento City and Sacramento County move to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act. Defendants also move to strike portions of plaintiffs’ complaint. For the reasons below, the court grants in part defendants’ motions to dismiss and motions to strike. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Susan Hood, Chester McNabb, Roland Haley, Connie Manselle and Kenneth 23 Barstow bring this putative class action to enjoin defendants Sacramento City and County. First Am. Compl. (FAC), ECF No. 11. Plaintiffs—all individuals with mobility disabilities under the ADA— allege defendants “fail[ed] to maintain [their] sidewalks clear of debris and tent encampments, which is necessary to make [their]…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.